diff --git a/tech/2024-04-30_why-am-i-publishing-under-non-foss-license/index.gmi b/tech/2024-04-30_why-am-i-publishing-under-non-foss-license/index.gmi
index e0669d1..d01fe4b 100644
--- a/tech/2024-04-30_why-am-i-publishing-under-non-foss-license/index.gmi
+++ b/tech/2024-04-30_why-am-i-publishing-under-non-foss-license/index.gmi
@@ -1,8 +1,12 @@
-# Why am I publishing under a non-FOSS license?
+# Why am I publishing under a non-FLOSS license?
+
+> “Abbreviation of free/libre/open source software.”
+> “Coordinate terms: FOSS, OSS”
+=> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/FLOSS Wiktionary page for FLOSS.
 
 Well... an interesting and highly controversial question, right? Absolutely!
 
-You probably think that a non-free licence is necessarily a bad thing and any good license must respect the 4 golden FOSS freedoms?
+You probably think that a non-free licence is necessarily a bad thing and any good license must respect the 4 golden FLOSS freedoms?
 Ehhh, on that subject I think not, let me explain my opinion on this.
 
 I hope it will make a lot more sense to you after that!
@@ -35,7 +39,7 @@ And even with software released under GPL (and it's derivatives, well know for 
 
 ### I don't care about the 4 technocratic freedoms
 
-I'm not that committed to the “holy rules“ of the Free/Libre and open-source software.
+I'm not that committed to the “holy rules” of the Free/Libre and open-source software.
 
 In fact, I see many things to criticize in them.
 
@@ -81,9 +85,9 @@ This license is simply doing that accordingly to my ideals.
 It also tells people like me that they have a place, that they will be protected, that their lives are worthwhile.
 And that they can have a little trust in me and in the people who stay around, because the triage is done.
 
-### FOSS licenses are lying
+### FLOSS licenses are lying
 
-FOSS licenses are technocratic and libertarian, but it's hidden, thank to a big omission lie.
+FLOSS licenses are technocratic and libertarian, but it's hidden, thank to a big omission lie.
 And that stinks (in a bad way).
 
 #### The “freedom to use” is already limited
@@ -130,14 +134,14 @@ Until all the structures that perpetuate oppression have been dismantled, until
 
 ### Why couldn't I add limitations since there are several (but hidden) ones?
 
-People are mad because I'm limiting their choices but they don't care that the actual limitations of the FOSS licenses are already doing that to marginalized people. Or worse: they endorse it.
+People are mad because I'm limiting their choices but they don't care that the actual limitations of the FLOSS licenses are already doing that to marginalized people. Or worse: they endorse it.
 
-I acknowledge that FOSS licenses are not perfect and I understand their design when I consciously add limitations. I don't alter their spirit when I add limitations, I use a tool already well designed for that purpose.
+I acknowledge that FLOSS licenses are not perfect and I understand their design when I consciously add limitations. I don't alter their spirit when I add limitations, I use a tool already well designed for that purpose.
 
-Maybe the FOSS' hidden limitations suit you: that's fine. As long as you understand what's at stake.
+Maybe the FLOSS' hidden limitations suit you: that's fine. As long as you understand what's at stake.
 The point is: I don't like their consequences, that's all.
 
-The limitations of the “non-FOSS” licences I'm using suit me, that's fine and I understand what's at stake.
+The limitations of the “non-FLOSS” licences I'm using suit me, that's fine and I understand what's at stake.
 The point is: if you disagree with me, you don't like their consequences, that's all.
 
 ### It will piss off privileged people…
@@ -156,14 +160,14 @@ I'm fighting for a better world so that no one has to suffer like this. And if t
 ### Yes, the licenses I am using are not perfect, but…
 
 1. I don't have to fix the world alone.
-2. I still prefer my “non-FOSS” licenses over your FOSS ones.
+2. I still prefer my “non-FLOSS” licenses over your FLOSS ones.
 
 ### You have a different opinion?
 
 Great. I don't care. Keep it to yourself if you do not apply the points listed in the “The ‘4 freedoms’ are politics and are defending a certain worldview that I don't share” section. Thanks.
 
 
-Xana,
+Émy,
 
 published the 30/04/2024